Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

UCSF

UC San Francisco Previously Published Works bannerUCSF

Cost-effectiveness and population impact of statins for primary prevention in adults aged 75 years or older in the United States.

Published Web Location

https://doi.org/10.7326/m14-1430
Abstract

Background

Evidence to guide primary prevention in adults aged 75 years or older is limited.

Objective

To project the population impact and cost-effectiveness of statin therapy in adults aged 75 years or older.

Design

Forecasting study using the Cardiovascular Disease Policy Model, a Markov model.

Data sources

Trial, cohort, and nationally representative data sources.

Target population

U.S. adults aged 75 to 94 years.

Time horizon

10 years.

Perspective

Health care system.

Intervention

Statins for primary prevention based on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol threshold of 4.91 mmol/L (190 mg/dL), 4.14 mmol/L (160 mg/dL), or 3.36 mmol/L (130 mg/dL); presence of diabetes; or 10-year risk score of at least 7.5%.

Outcome measures

Myocardial infarction (MI), coronary heart disease (CHD) death, disability-adjusted life-years, and costs.

Results of base-case analysis

All adults aged 75 years or older in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey have a 10-year risk score greater than 7.5%. If statins had no effect on functional limitation or cognitive impairment, all primary prevention strategies would prevent MIs and CHD deaths and be cost-effective. Treatment of all adults aged 75 to 94 years would result in 8 million additional users and prevent 105 000 (4.3%) incident MIs and 68 000 (2.3%) CHD deaths at an incremental cost per disability-adjusted life-year of $25 200.

Results of sensitivity analysis

An increased relative risk for functional limitation or mild cognitive impairment of 1.10 to 1.29 could offset the cardiovascular benefits.

Limitation

Limited trial evidence targeting primary prevention in adults aged 75 years or older.

Conclusion

At effectiveness similar to that in trials, statins are projected to be cost-effective for primary prevention; however, even a small increase in geriatric-specific adverse effects could offset the cardiovascular benefit. Improved data on the potential benefits and harms of statins are needed to inform decision making.

Primary funding source

American Heart Association Western States Affiliate, National Institute on Aging, and the National Institute for Diabetes on Digestive and Kidney Diseases.

Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC's open access policies. Let us know how this access is important for you.

Main Content
For improved accessibility of PDF content, download the file to your device.
Current View