Skip to main content
Download PDF
- Main
Cost-effectiveness and population impact of statins for primary prevention in adults aged 75 years or older in the United States.
Published Web Location
https://doi.org/10.7326/m14-1430Abstract
Background
Evidence to guide primary prevention in adults aged 75 years or older is limited.Objective
To project the population impact and cost-effectiveness of statin therapy in adults aged 75 years or older.Design
Forecasting study using the Cardiovascular Disease Policy Model, a Markov model.Data sources
Trial, cohort, and nationally representative data sources.Target population
U.S. adults aged 75 to 94 years.Time horizon
10 years.Perspective
Health care system.Intervention
Statins for primary prevention based on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol threshold of 4.91 mmol/L (190 mg/dL), 4.14 mmol/L (160 mg/dL), or 3.36 mmol/L (130 mg/dL); presence of diabetes; or 10-year risk score of at least 7.5%.Outcome measures
Myocardial infarction (MI), coronary heart disease (CHD) death, disability-adjusted life-years, and costs.Results of base-case analysis
All adults aged 75 years or older in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey have a 10-year risk score greater than 7.5%. If statins had no effect on functional limitation or cognitive impairment, all primary prevention strategies would prevent MIs and CHD deaths and be cost-effective. Treatment of all adults aged 75 to 94 years would result in 8 million additional users and prevent 105 000 (4.3%) incident MIs and 68 000 (2.3%) CHD deaths at an incremental cost per disability-adjusted life-year of $25 200.Results of sensitivity analysis
An increased relative risk for functional limitation or mild cognitive impairment of 1.10 to 1.29 could offset the cardiovascular benefits.Limitation
Limited trial evidence targeting primary prevention in adults aged 75 years or older.Conclusion
At effectiveness similar to that in trials, statins are projected to be cost-effective for primary prevention; however, even a small increase in geriatric-specific adverse effects could offset the cardiovascular benefit. Improved data on the potential benefits and harms of statins are needed to inform decision making.Primary funding source
American Heart Association Western States Affiliate, National Institute on Aging, and the National Institute for Diabetes on Digestive and Kidney Diseases.Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC's open access policies. Let us know how this access is important for you.
Main Content
For improved accessibility of PDF content, download the file to your device.
Enter the password to open this PDF file:
File name:
-
File size:
-
Title:
-
Author:
-
Subject:
-
Keywords:
-
Creation Date:
-
Modification Date:
-
Creator:
-
PDF Producer:
-
PDF Version:
-
Page Count:
-
Page Size:
-
Fast Web View:
-
Preparing document for printing…
0%