- Main
Decolonization in Nursing Homes to Prevent Infection and Hospitalization
- Miller, Loren G;
- McKinnell, James A;
- Singh, Raveena D;
- Gussin, Gabrielle M;
- Kleinman, Ken;
- Saavedra, Raheeb;
- Mendez, Job;
- Catuna, Tabitha D;
- Felix, James;
- Chang, Justin;
- Heim, Lauren;
- Franco, Ryan;
- Tjoa, Thomas;
- Stone, Nimalie D;
- Steinberg, Karl;
- Beecham, Nancy;
- Montgomery, Jocelyn;
- Walters, DeAnn;
- Park, Steven;
- Tam, Steven;
- Gohil, Shruti K;
- Robinson, Philip A;
- Estevez, Marlene;
- Lewis, Brian;
- Shimabukuro, Julie A;
- Tchakalian, Gregory;
- Miner, Aaron;
- Torres, Crystal;
- Evans, Kaye D;
- Bittencourt, Cassiana E;
- He, Jiayi;
- Lee, Eunjung;
- Nedelcu, Christine;
- Lu, Julia;
- Agrawal, Shalini;
- Sturdevant, S Gwynn;
- Peterson, Ellena;
- Huang, Susan S
Published Web Location
https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2215254Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nursing home residents are at high risk for infection, hospitalization, and colonization with multidrug-resistant organisms. METHODS: We performed a cluster-randomized trial of universal decolonization as compared with routine-care bathing in nursing homes. The trial included an 18-month baseline period and an 18-month intervention period. Decolonization entailed the use of chlorhexidine for all routine bathing and showering and administration of nasal povidone-iodine twice daily for the first 5 days after admission and then twice daily for 5 days every other week. The primary outcome was transfer to a hospital due to infection. The secondary outcome was transfer to a hospital for any reason. An intention-to-treat (as-assigned) difference-in-differences analysis was performed for each outcome with the use of generalized linear mixed models to compare the intervention period with the baseline period across trial groups. RESULTS: Data were obtained from 28 nursing homes with a total of 28,956 residents. Among the transfers to a hospital in the routine-care group, 62.2% (the mean across facilities) were due to infection during the baseline period and 62.6% were due to infection during the intervention period (risk ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.96 to 1.04). The corresponding values in the decolonization group were 62.9% and 52.2% (risk ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.79 to 0.88), for a difference in risk ratio, as compared with routine care, of 16.6% (95% CI, 11.0 to 21.8; P<0.001). Among the discharges from the nursing home in the routine-care group, transfer to a hospital for any reason accounted for 36.6% during the baseline period and for 39.2% during the intervention period (risk ratio, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.12). The corresponding values in the decolonization group were 35.5% and 32.4% (risk ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.88 to 0.96), for a difference in risk ratio, as compared with routine care, of 14.6% (95% CI, 9.7 to 19.2). The number needed to treat was 9.7 to prevent one infection-related hospitalization and 8.9 to prevent one hospitalization for any reason. CONCLUSIONS: In nursing homes, universal decolonization with chlorhexidine and nasal iodophor led to a significantly lower risk of transfer to a hospital due to infection than routine care. (Funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; Protect ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03118232.).
Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC's open access policies. Let us know how this access is important for you.