Skip to main content
Toward a better understanding of when to apply propensity scoring: a comparison with conventional regression in ethnic disparities research.
- Author(s): Ye, Yu;
- Bond, Jason C;
- Schmidt, Laura A;
- Mulia, Nina;
- Tam, Tammy W
- et al.
Published Web Locationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2012.07.008
PurposeDespite growing popularity of propensity score (PS) methods used in ethnic disparities studies, many researchers lack clear understanding of when to use PS in place of conventional regression models. One such scenario is presented here: When the relationship between ethnicity and primary care utilization is confounded with and modified by socioeconomic status. Here, standard regression fails to produce an overall disparity estimate, whereas PS methods can through the choice of a reference sample (RS) to which the effect estimate is generalized.
MethodsUsing data from the National Alcohol Surveys, ethnic disparities between White and Hispanics in access to primary care were estimated using PS methods (PS stratification and weighting), standard logistic regression, and the marginal effects from logistic regression models incorporating effect modification.
ResultsWhites, Hispanics, and combined White/Hispanic samples were used separately as the RS. Two strategies utilizing PS generated disparities estimates different from those from standard logistic regression, but similar to marginal odd ratios from logistic regression with ethnicity by covariate interactions included in the model.
ConclusionsWhen effect modification is present, PS estimates are comparable with marginal estimates from regression models incorporating effect modification. The estimation process requires a priori hypotheses to guide selection of the RS.
For improved accessibility of PDF content, download the file to your device.