Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

Response of consumer and research grade indoor air quality monitors to residential sources of fine particles

  • Author(s): Singer, BC
  • Delp, WW
  • et al.

Published Web Location

https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.12463
No data is associated with this publication.
Abstract

© 2018 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd The ability to inexpensively monitor PM2.5to identify sources and enable controls would advance residential indoor air quality (IAQ) management. Consumer IAQ monitors incorporating low-cost optical particle sensors and connections with smart home platforms could provide this service if they reliably detect PM2.5in homes. In this study, particles from typical residential sources were generated in a 120 m3laboratory and time-concentration profiles were measured with 7 consumer monitors (2-3 units each), 2 research monitors (Thermo pDR-1500, MetOne BT-645), a Grimm Mini Wide-Range Aerosol Spectrometer (GRM), and a Tapered Element Oscillating Microbalance with Filter Dynamic Measurement System (FDMS), a Federal Equivalent Method for PM2.5. Sources included recreational combustion (candles, cigarettes, incense), cooking activities, an unfiltered ultrasonic humidifier, and dust. FDMS measurements, filter samples, and known densities were used to adjust the GRM to obtain time-resolved mass concentrations. Data from the research monitors and 4 of the consumer monitors—AirBeam, AirVisual, Foobot, Purple Air—were time correlated and within a factor of 2 of the estimated mass concentrations for most sources. All 7 of the consumer and both research monitors substantially under-reported or missed events for which the emitted mass was comprised of particles smaller than 0.3 μm diameter.

Item not freely available? Link broken?
Report a problem accessing this item