UC Berkeley

In a polymorphic change in which the phases differ only by a reversible difference in specific volume, kinematics requires a unit mass to suffer deviatoric strain in the instant it is transformed. Unlike the Eshelby stress–free strain, this strain is a property of the motion. Its existence must be considered when formulating the constitutive relation for the product of an incoherent transformation. To show this, two models are compared: in both, the (Nabarro) condition of vanishing shear stress is imposed at the incoherent interface; they differ only in the treatment of the deviatoric strain at issue. In the existing model, deviatoric stress within a unit mass of product is determined by total deviatoric strain from its initial state as parent phase. In the new model, lattice reconstruction is assumed to erase all memory within the unit mass of deviatoric strain suffered before, or during, its transformation. The existing model is not consistent with experiments on the olivine spinel–phase change in single crystals. It predicts that when the pressure applied exceeds a critical value, samples should transform completely at almost constant rate; instead, growth is seen to slow, and may even cease. The new model predicts this. Without adjustable constants, fair agreement is obtained with experiments on samples having 75–200 ppmw of water. Because elastic deformation by itself can explain those observations, the very thin rims seen on even drier samples suggest that water may be essential to lattice reconstruction in this phase change.