Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

Representational Similarity and Context Inference as a Shared Computational Account for False Memories in Humans

Creative Commons 'BY' version 4.0 license
Abstract

Human memory is constructive: representations that support generalization can also produce systematic errors. Two robust examples—the Deese–Roediger–McDermott paradigm and the misinformation effect—are typically explained by separate theories, from fuzzy-trace representations to source-monitoring failures. We propose a shared computational account in which both phenomena arise from similarity-weighted retrieval over compressed semantic representations. We leverage the Integrated Semantics with Context Inference model, a simple feedforward network that learns independent semantic relationships between items that can then be modulated by context. The model reproduces hallmark human patterns: (i) increased false recognition of critical lures as a function of semantic similarity and list length, and (ii) recognition judgments shift systematically after misleading post-event information. In the misinformation paradigm, inferred event representations shift toward the distractor, quantitatively capturing effect strength. Together, these results suggest that diverse false memory phenomena can be understood as consequences of similarity-based inference.