Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

Directional biases in durative inference

Creative Commons 'BY' version 4.0 license
Abstract

Descriptions of durational relations can be ambiguous, e.g., thedescription ‘two different meetings happened at the same time’could mean that one meeting started before the other ended, orit could mean that the meetings both started and endedsimultaneously. A recent theory posits that people mentallysimulate events with durations by representing the starts andends of events along a chronological axis (Khemlani et al.,2015). To draw conclusions from this durational mental model,reasoners consciously scan it in the direction of earlier timepoints to later time points. The account predicts that peopleshould prefer descriptions that are congruent with achronological scanning procedure, e.g., descriptions thatmention the starts of events before the ends of events. Twoexperiments corroborate the prediction, and show thatchronological biases in temporal reasoning manifest in caseswhen reasoners consciously evaluate the durations of events.

Main Content
For improved accessibility of PDF content, download the file to your device.
Current View