Security, Violent Events, and Anticipated Surge Capabilities of Emergency Departments in Washington State
Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

Security, Violent Events, and Anticipated Surge Capabilities of Emergency Departments in Washington State

  • Author(s): Weyand, Jonathan S
  • Junck, Emily
  • Kang, Christopher S
  • Heiner, Jason D
  • et al.
Abstract

Background: Over the past 15 years, violent threats and acts against hospital patients, staff, and providers have increased and escalated. The leading area for violence is the emergency department given its 24/7 operations, its role in patient care, admissions gateway, and the center for influxes during acute surge events.

Objectives: This investigation had three objectives: to assess the current security of Washington State EDs, to estimate the prevalence of and response to threats and violence in Washington State EDs, and to appraise the Washington State ED security capability to respond to acute influxes of patients, bystanders, and media during acute surge events.

Methods: A voluntary, blinded, 28-question web-based survey developed by ED physicians was electronically delivered to all 87 Washington State ED Directors in January 2013. Responses were evaluated by descriptive statistical analyses.

Results: Analyses occurred after 90% (78/87) of ED Directors responded. Annual censes of the EDs ranged from < 20,000 to 100,000 patients and represented the entire spectrum of practice environments, including critical access hospitals to a regional quaternary referral medical center. Thirty-four of 75 (45%) reported the current level of security was inadequate based on the general consensus of their ED staff. Nearly two-thirds (63%) of EDs had 24-hour security personnel coverage, 28% reported no assigned security personnel. Security personnel training was provided by 45% of hospitals or health care systems. Sixty-nine of 78 (88%) respondents witnessed or heard violent threats or acts occurring in their ED. Of these, 93% were directed towards nursing staff, 90% towards physicians, 74% towards security personnel, and 51% towards administrative personnel. Nearly half (48%) noted incidents directed towards another patient, and 50% towards a patient’s family or friend. These events were variably reported to the hospital administration. After an acute surge event, 35% believed the initial additional security response would not be adequate and 26% reporting no additional security would be available within 15 minutes.

Conclusion: Our study reveals the variability of ED security staffing and a heterogeneity of capabilities throughout Washington State. These deficiencies and vulnerabilities are likely shared by and relevant for other EDs and regional emergency preparedness planners.

Main Content
Current View